This week we officially started playing with unity a bit and trying to learn how to code and learn how to use it better. For the sake of learning, we started playing around with a 2D tutorial from Lynda, which was pretty helpful. Here is some of the code we've been working with this week:
Friday, October 23, 2015
Art 451: Research
We are still researching how we want to approach making this game, and have looked at other games for good examples. In order to make a sound exploration game it has become apparent to us that we will need to record a lot of different sounds, as well as make something as aesthetically pleasing as the sound is. One of the games we looked into is called SimTunes.
There's also a few games we looked at that allow the player to create any beat that they would like and make a decent sounding song out of it, and it was always randomly used in any given way.
Art 451: Concept
Both Connor and myself wanted to design a game utilizing unity as more of a sound exploration game. We threw around ideas as to whether or not we wanted it to be 2d or 3d, and we decided to dabble with making a 3D game. Aesthetically we still haven't come up with any ideas, but we are still getting used to coding in unity for now.
Thursday, May 7, 2015
Artist Talk: Teching Hsieh
Teching Hsieh
Teching
Hsieh is a performance artist known for his one-year works that take an extreme
amount of dedication and perseverance to complete. During his artist talk he mentioned, “One
year is just a small dent compared to the whole lifetime.” This quote by him essentially becomes the
justification for his works as a whole.
For
starters, his work, “Cage”, was the most intriguing piece that has been
completed by him in my opinion. During
the duration of his talk, I could not imagine having to sit in a cage for an
entire year deliberately without being an actual prisoner. This makes me wonder whether or not he is
consciously “othering” him from actual prisoners which is another reason why
this piece stood out to me the most. He
had little to no human contact for the duration of this piece, and he scratched
a tally mark for every single day that passed until he reached one year.
The second
piece that stood out to me was his “Outdoor Piece”. Going back to the statement made earlier, I
am still wondering whether or not he intended to other himself from homeless
people. He deliberately lived outdoors in
the city for an entire year without stepping inside once. During his talk he mentioned that he did not
trust or the homeless people that he encountered and thus never tried to
associate with them. I found this ironic
considering his was actually homeless, on his very own accord for the sake of
art, and had no intentions of having any sort of relations with any actual
homeless people.
Artist Exhibition: Pink Elephants on Parade
Pink
Elephants on Parade Review
The
exhibition created by Nick van Woert, Pink Elephants on Parade; located in
Church of Fine Arts made use of the concept of how humans interact and make use
of various resources because it is a compelling subject that grabs the viewers’
eye. Throughout the exhibition there are
eight sculptures and installations that have been placed at various parts of
the room. At first glance, there
appeared to be no correlating theme between any of the pieces in the gallery,
however after proper scrutiny I could conclude the theme between the pieces was
about resources, and the human interaction with the resources.
As
you walk into the gallery, there is a sculpture that immediately greets your
eyes at the door. From the backside
which faces the viewer as the viewer walks into the gallery, it just looks like
a messy black splatter, which intrigued me to figure out what the rest of the
sculpture looked like around the side. After
finding a different view, this piece appears to represent an unhealthy shift of
power between man and nature. It seems
as though the character in this sculpture is Poseidon, “Greek god of the sea”,
that is covered in oil and is struggling to escape from this oil
entrapment. Now the shift in power is
that the artist is trying to tell the viewers that not even a god can escape
the disastrous effects of human consumption of resources such as oil. I believe this piece could even be a
reference to the most recent oil disaster that occurred that, four years later,
is still having an effect and killing wildlife within the Mexican Gulf.
After
moving further into the gallery, on the immediate right hand side of the room
there seemed to be some sort of throne-like sculpture that was made out of
various resources trapped in glass. In
relation to the first piece involving oil and Poseidon, this sculpture appears
to be taking on this idea that humans are in charge to a new level. This idea that if this sculpture is in fact
representing a throne, this entails that the person imagined to be sitting on
the throne is literally sitting atop of various resources. A throne, in other words, implies a monarchy
or some sort of representation of power.
That being said, have a throne made out of those various resources
implies that the person that sits on this throne is representing the power
humans have over using these resources.
While
there is the use of resource consumption, this also implies the gravity of
human development and industrial technology.
There is a piece that is created out of stainless steel that lies on the
ground as is in the middle of the gallery space. It looks as though this piece was created to
represent the use of resources that has brought us so far as to create
automobiles and other forms of heavy machinery, which as it exists, consumes
resources to function as well. In this
case, this looks to be an exhaust skeleton or frame that represents a car. That being said, a car use a notorious piece
of machinery that is one of the main reasons as to why we produce and consume
so much oil. Which, of course, makes a
connection to that very first sculpture referencing an oil spill, which was due
to our high demand for the consumption of oil.
The
only piece that was actually hung up on the wall was a piece that was set in
two separate but identical parts. This
is one of the few pieces in the gallery that actually has a name, America Pine
Bark. The dimensions of the frame are
84x58 inches and 3 inches thick. Inside
of the frame of this piece, there is bark from a tree seamlessly placed within
to create a flat surface. What I
personally could not wrap my head around with this piece, was the idea of
knowing that trees are round, and therefore bark is also rounded, but how could
the artist possibly have flattened out the bark in such a way that made it seem
like it was stuck on a flat canvas. Let
alone, the fact that the bark seems to be just one big, unhindered piece that
was placed there. There seems to be no
such cracks or any marks or any visual signs whatsoever that implies that he
simply patched a piece up with stray pieces of bark. Now in addition to that though, this piece
took a while for me to make a connection with the rest of the work viewed in
the gallery. There was no oil
representation, no metal, no human-like interaction that appeared to be
involved, simply all I saw was flattened bark in a frame on the wall. However, I began to realize that in the most
literal sense possible, trees are in fact a resource. In this particular case, a tree was used as a
resource to create art in a gallery to be viewed. Although, I do not think that this was the
idea of representation that Nick van Woert had in mind when creating this
piece, but I feel that it cleverly does symbolize and connect with the rest of
the gallery.
In
terms of how the gallery works were presented throughout, I believed some of the
pieces to be presented effectively, however, other pieces I believed were
presented very poorly. I thought it was
great for that very first piece to be placed right near the doorway because
that gives the viewer an immediate sense of what is going on. I also thought the American Pine Bark was
installed very effectively as well.
However, there were a few pieces in the gallery that it seemed like
there was not much thought in terms of how or where they wanted to place
them. Although, Nick van Woerts’ work
was definitely effective regardless of placement and presentation, because it
forced me, as a viewer, to think about each individual piece, and want to see
more in the future.
Artist Talk: Joel Swanson
Joel Swanson is an artist that primarily practices with digital media, sculptures, and interactive design projects. His main focus throughout his work was implementing linguistic and literary theory. His work practices the linguistic materials and thematics of various parts of written language. However, some works are better than others, and although I respect his attempts at practicing one continuous theme throughout his work, I find a lot of his work to be somewhat bland.
His piece, "Lady Gaga's Twitter Feed, Translated into Morse Code", is an exceptional use of digital media and quite an interesting idea comparing and contrasting two completely different styles of communication. While Twitter is referencing our use of modern day communication, he correlates it with morse which has been around for many years. However, in my opinion, once you look past the surface meaning of the comparing new communications versus old communications, I find this work to lack any real meaning. A lot of his work is extremely heavy handed towards his obvious theme toward language, and there's no way around it. Maybe that's the beauty of his work that some people might love and desire, however, considering most all of his work only has a surface level meaning, I don't necessarily find it intriguing.
His piece, "Lady Gaga's Twitter Feed, Translated into Morse Code", is an exceptional use of digital media and quite an interesting idea comparing and contrasting two completely different styles of communication. While Twitter is referencing our use of modern day communication, he correlates it with morse which has been around for many years. However, in my opinion, once you look past the surface meaning of the comparing new communications versus old communications, I find this work to lack any real meaning. A lot of his work is extremely heavy handed towards his obvious theme toward language, and there's no way around it. Maybe that's the beauty of his work that some people might love and desire, however, considering most all of his work only has a surface level meaning, I don't necessarily find it intriguing.
Wednesday, May 6, 2015
ART 350 Final Project
This project is a response to technology
and our society’s reliance and attentiveness towards it. I created a 3D model
and placed it in front of a TV that has Google street view on the screen. I then used a camera to take pictures of the
model being placed in front of the TV in order to create a stop motion video. Finally, I have the video being projected by
a pocket projector device while the actual 3D model is seen in front of the
projected image. This process is a very
heavy handed and redundant response toward technology use within our society.
In addition to that, in terms of
context, I painted the car model red because that is intended to be an
“attention grabber” while driving through some of the most popular streets in
the world as a portrayal of how technology captures our eyes everywhere we go.
These streets, for reference, are: The Las Vegas Strip, Abbey Road in London,
Hollywood Boulevard in LA, La Rambla in Barcelona, 7th Street/ Times
Square in NY, and Bourbon Street in New Orleans. The shift of focus between the
car model and the background images is a nauseating attempt at portraying our
shift of attention with technology.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
